The Nobel Lecture given by The 2003 Nobel Peace
Prize Laureate, Shirin Ebadi (Oslo, December 10, 2003)
In the name of the God of Creation and Wisdom
Your Majesty, Your Royal Highneses, Honourable
Members of the Norwegian Nobel Committee, Excellencies, Ladies and
I feel extremely honoured that today my voice is
reaching the people of the world from this distinguished venue. This great
honour has been bestowed upon me by the Norwegian Nobel Committee. I
salute the spirit of Alfred Nobel and hail all true followers of his path.
This year, the Nobel Peace Prize has been awarded
to a woman from Iran, a Muslim country in the Middle East.
Undoubtedly, my selection will be an inspiration
to the masses of women who are striving to realize their rights, not only
in Iran but throughout the region - rights taken away from them through
the passage of history. This selection will make women in Iran, and much
further afield, believe in themselves. Women constitute half of the
population of every country. To disregard women and bar them from active
participation in political, social, economic and cultural life would in
fact be tantamount to depriving the entire population of every society of
half its capability. The patriarchal culture and the discrimination
against women, particularly in the Islamic countries, cannot continue for
Honourable members of the Norwegian Nobel
As you are aware, the honour and blessing of this
prize will have a positive and far-reaching impact on the humanitarian and
genuine endeavours of the people of Iran and the region. The magnitude of
this blessing will embrace every freedom-loving and peace-seeking
individual, whether they are women or men.
I thank the Norwegian Nobel Committee for this
honour that has been bestowed upon me and for the blessing of this honour
for the peace-loving people of my country.
Today coincides with the 55th anniversary of the
adoption of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights; a declaration which
begins with the recognition of the inherent dignity and the equal and
inalienable rights of all members of the human family, as the guarantor of
freedom, justice and peace. And it promises a world in which human beings
shall enjoy freedom of expression and opinion, and be safeguarded and
protected against fear and poverty.
Unfortunately, however, this year's report by the
United Nations Development Programme (UNDP), as in the previous years,
spells out the rise of a disaster which distances mankind from the
idealistic world of the authors of the Universal Declaration of Human
Rights. In 2002, almost 1.2 billion human beings lived in glaring poverty,
earning less than one dollar a day. Over 50 countries were caught up in
war or natural disasters. AIDS has so far claimed the lives of 22 million
individuals, and turned 13 million children into orphans.
At the same time, in the past two years, some
states have violated the universal principles and laws of human rights by
using the events of 11 September and the war on international terrorism as
a pretext. The United Nations General Assembly Resolution 57/219, of 18
December 2002, the United Nations Security Council Resolution 1456, of 20
January 2003, and the United Nations Commission on Human Rights Resolution
2003/68, of 25 April 2003, set out and underline that all states must
ensure that any measures taken to combat terrorism must comply with all
their obligations under international law, in particular international
human rights and humanitarian law. However, regulations restricting human
rights and basic freedoms, special bodies and extraordinary courts, which
make fair adjudication difficult and at times impossible, have been
justified and given legitimacy under the cloak of the war on terrorism.
The concerns of human rights' advocates increase
when they observe that international human rights laws are breached not
only by their recognized opponents under the pretext of cultural
relativity, but that these principles are also violated in Western
democracies, in other words countries which were themselves among the
initial codifiers of the United Nations Charter and the Universal
Declaration of Human Rights. It is in this framework that, for months,
hundreds of individuals who were arrested in the course of military
conflicts have been imprisoned in Guantanamo, without the benefit of the
rights stipulated under the international Geneva conventions, the
Universal Declaration of Human Rights and the [United Nations]
International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights.
Moreover, a question which millions of citizens in
the international civil society have been asking themselves for the past
few years, particularly in recent months, and continue to ask, is this:
why is it that some decisions and resolutions of the UN Security Council
are binding, while some other resolutions of the council have no binding
force? Why is it that in the past 35 years, dozens of UN resolutions
concerning the occupation of the Palestinian territories by the state of
Israel have not been implemented promptly, yet, in the past 12 years, the
state and people of Iraq, once on the recommendation of the Security
Council, and the second time, in spite of UN Security Council opposition,
were subjected to attack, military assault, economic sanctions, and,
ultimately, military occupation??
Ladies and Gentlemen,
Allow me to say a little about my country, region,
culture and faith.
I am an Iranian. A descendent of Cyrus The Great.
The very emperor who proclaimed at the pinnacle of power 2500 years ago
that “... he would not reign over the people if they did not wish it.
And [he] promised not to force any person to change his religion and faith
and guaranteed freedom for all”. The Charter of Cyrus The Great is one
of the most important documents that should be studied in the history of
I am a Muslim. In the Koran the Prophet of Islam
has been cited as saying: “Thou shalt believe in thine faith and I in my
religion”. That same divine book sees the mission of all prophets as
that of inviting all human beings to uphold justice. Since the advent of
Islam, too, Iran's civilization and culture has become imbued and infused
with humanitarianism, respect for the life, belief and faith of others,
propagation of tolerance and compromise and avoidance of violence,
bloodshed and war. The luminaries of Iranian literature, in particular our
Gnostic literature, from Hafiz, Mowlavi [better known in the West as Rumi]
and Attar to Saadi, Sanaei, Naser Khosrow and Nezami, are emissaries of
this humanitarian culture. Their message manifests itself in this poem by
The sons of Adam are limbs of one another Having
been created of one essence.
When the calamity of time afflicts one limb The
other limbs cannot remain at rest.
The people of Iran have been battling against
consecutive conflicts between tradition and modernity for over 100 years.
By resorting to ancient traditions, some have tried and are trying to see
the world through the eyes of their predecessors and to deal with the
problems and difficulties of the existing world by virtue of the values of
the ancients. But, many others, while respecting their historical and
cultural past and their religion and faith, seek to go forth in step with
world developments and not lag behind the caravan of civilization,
development and progress. The people of Iran, particularly in the recent
years, have shown that they deem participation in public affairs to be
their right, and that they want to be masters of their own destiny.
This conflict is observed not merely in Iran, but
also in many Muslim states. Some Muslims, under the pretext that democracy
and human rights are not compatible with Islamic teachings and the
traditional structure of Islamic societies, have justified despotic
governments, and continue to do so. In fact, it is not so easy to rule
over a people who are aware of their rights, using traditional,
patriarchal and paternalistic methods.
Islam is a religion whose first sermon to the
Prophet begins with the word “Recite!” The Koran swears by the pen and
what it writes. Such a sermon and message cannot be in conflict with
awareness, knowledge, wisdom, freedom of opinion and expression and
The discriminatory plight of women in Islamic
states, too, whether in the sphere of civil law or in the realm of social,
political and cultural justice, has its roots in the patriarchal and
male-dominated culture prevailing in these societies, not in Islam. This
culture does not tolerate freedom and democracy, just as it does not
believe in the equal rights of men and women, and the liberation of women
from male domination (fathers, husbands, brothers ...), because it would
threaten the historical and traditional position of the rulers and
guardians of that culture.
One has to say to those who have mooted the idea
of a clash of civilizations, or prescribed war and military intervention
for this region, and resorted to social, cultural, economic and political
sluggishness of the South in a bid to justify their actions and opinions,
that if you consider international human rights laws, including the
nations' right to determine their own destinies, to be universal, and if
you believe in the priority and superiority of parliamentary democracy
over other political systems, then you cannot think only of your own
security and comfort, selfishly and contemptuously. A quest for new means
and ideas to enable the countries of the South, too, to enjoy human rights
and democracy, while maintaining their political independence and
territorial integrity of their respective countries, must be given top
priority by the United Nations in respect of future developments and
The decision by the Nobel Peace Committee to award
the 2003 prize to me, as the first Iranian and the first woman from a
Muslim country, inspires me and millions of Iranians and nationals of
Islamic states with the hope that our efforts, endeavours and struggles
toward the realization of human rights and the establishment of democracy
in our respective countries enjoy the support, backing and solidarity of
international civil society. This prize belongs to the people of Iran. It
belongs to the people of the Islamic states, and the people of the South
for establishing human rights and democracy.
Ladies and Gentlemen
In the introduction to my speech, I spoke of human
rights as a guarantor of freedom, justice and peace. If human rights fail
to be manifested in codified laws or put into effect by states, then, as
rendered in the preamble of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights,
human beings will be left with no choice other than staging a “rebellion
against tyranny and oppression”. A human being divested of all dignity,
a human being deprived of human rights, a human being gripped by
starvation, a human being beaten by famine, war and illness, a humiliated
human being and a plundered human being is not in any position or state to
recover the rights he or she has lost.
If the 21st century wishes to free itself from the
cycle of violence, acts of terror and war, and avoid repetition of the
experience of the 20th century - that most disaster-ridden century of
humankind, there is no other way except by understanding and putting into
practice every human right for all mankind, irrespective of race, gender,
faith, nationality or social status.
In anticipation of that day.
With much gratitude
Copyright © The Nobel Foundation, Stockholm,